Shuffleboard Where To Put Sand

Quete! Bet on GNU / Linux

A Small and incomplete history

the late 60's, "two projects changed the history of COMPUTING to Forever: The Rise of C Programming Language and Operating System Unix , programmed entirely in C. Already in the late 80's, after several events and several years of history that I will not develop here, a hacker named Richard Stallman (photo) had the brilliant idea of \u200b\u200bcreating a Unix-based operating system completely free. I call this GNU (Gnu is Not Unix). By the early 90's, almost everything was ready, except the core system ( kernel). A young Finnish programmer named Linus Torvalds , with the support and collaboration of the emerging Internet community, developed the core Lin ux and released under license GPL (license created by the FSF - Free Software Foundation-). Thus was born the GNU / Linux, the open system we know today. With years of development and community collaboration Free Software (and here we must clarify that the community is not only a community of developers but also users reporting bugs and providing technical support to other users).

links:
http://www.fsf.org/
http://www.gnu.org/home.es.html
http://www.linux-es.org/
http:// www.stallman.org/


The purpose of this bet

After much reading and wander through a lot of forums and blogs of people who do not know but with whom we share a common philosophy I was born the idea of \u200b\u200bmaking this bet. In principle to return to the community with a small contribution in exchange for all the help, and rewarding moments of quality software that gave me nothing in return. Because that is the philosophy of the community: freedom and collaboration. A bet that involves, first, the following compilation of useful links for the average user is informed and his first steps into the world of Free Software. Second, it implies a commitment to help provide technical support (within my limitations, of course) and personally install a GNU / Linux and leave it in top condition. Is a compromise.

What the hell are the distributions and why are there so many? .

The wikipedia defines GNU / Linux as

A Linux distribution or GNU / Linux (Often abbreviated distro) is a suite of applications that allow us to deliver improvements together to easily install an operating system based on GNU / Linux. There are flavors of Linux, in general, differ from each other by the configuration tools and management systems for installing software packages. The choice of distribution depends on the user's needs and personal tastes.


Here's a first taste of freedom. When a person decides to install GNU / Linux has many variants to choose from. There are distributions for all tastes: designed for servers, for geeks, extremists, new users, masks, designers sound, image and video, musicians, gamers, etc. One can choose a distribution according to a level of knowledge, tastes, needs, ignorance, etc. The important thing is that you can choose. And because of the freedom, the basic principle of free software, the answer to the second part of the question, there is so much distributions because the system as GNU / Linux is free, that is, anyone can create their own distribution. In fact, there is a tool called Builder for creating a distro.
At this point, I'm using They were Etch for AMD64 . My first distro was Ubuntu, a Debian-based distro. I started Ubuntu Dapper for two reasons: the greater community and ease of use. That's why this bet and links below are related to Debian (and that does not mean that anyone can add links to other Distros or copy this bet, as long as the original linkee, and modify it to bring it to other Distros) . I also tried the Live CD and installed Musix SUSE. I would be interested in any opportunity to test Ututo a distro Argentina, one of the first 100% free and Ubuntu Studio, an Ubuntu-based distro designed for musicians and designers. I also tried Damn Small Linux (DSL) to my old Pentium 166MMX. According to the Web
Distrowatch.com, the most popular distribution of GNU / Linux today is Ubuntu.

links:
http://distrowatch.com/
http://www.debian.org/
http://www.ubuntulinux.org/
http://es.opensuse . org /
https: / / www.ututo.org/www/
http://www.musix.org.ar/index.html
http://damnsmalllinux.org/index_es.html
http://distrowatch.com/
http://ubuntustudio.org/


Why discard Windows and switch to GNU / Lin ux ?

This is the simplest and most complicated question to answer. It is easy for those famirializados with GNU / Linux ... Bah ... Simple is more than obvious. The stability, security, large lots of free and quality. The community in general. Possibilities. Gnome, KDE, Amarok, K3b, Mozilla Firefox, Mplayer, Console, repositories, knowledge, the best use made of resources, the minimum amount of money needed, the ability to customize the system up down and a lot of reasons quite obvious to us. But go a little to the side of the street:


Microsoft did a damn. And bought QDOS was lucky to sell MS-DOS (QDOS modified) to IBM. MS-Windows 3.0 did in the early 90's what the Mac-OS made since 1984. Promised a great operating system gramme and gave us MS-Windows 95 ... then 98 ', the basophils of 2000 and the player-zombies clicks largest in history: MS-Windows XP. Since the emergence of Windows NT, Microsoft did nothing to "tune" the OS at the expense of the need to upgrade hardware with each new "tuned." That means: silver, silver and more money for those who want to be "in the latter." To make matters worse, the old myth that Windows is easy .... the habit of clicks fills us with the PC from spyware, viruses, exploits, malware, as the boys call it M $. "They are the" Bienware "perhaps?. Bush reminds me of the creation of a knight of the Crusades against the Muslim Diablo. Crashes, loss of information (how many times I lost my mp3, my docs, my jpg, my videos, my programs ...), instability, waste of resources and every window open I get a paper clip, a dog that hangs me all, and an assistant who treats me like an idiot.

there's the dirty game ....

Because despite being a disastrous operating system, steal, destroy, play dirty. Just shop around the links that leave at the end of this section.
And now we want to get Vista. Ie more money to buy a new computer, which probably cost us a few dollars more to come with Vista preinstalled. And Vista is the worst OS that saw mankind. Besides the fact that DirectX 10 is only for Vista, such as Office 2007, new versions of Explorer, Windows Media Player, want to make a monopoly with the "Vista certified" for the Hardware, the fuckings FUDS (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt 'fear, uncertainty and doubt) and the "standard" Office Open XML, leading to all users to have Vista and Office 2007 to work with docs and xls. A shame that is played in every "Windows is free, Emule me low," "Linux does not work 32536136 Winning Eleven" "I do not want anything more than check emails, watch fotologs, do practical work for faculty, chatting, watching videos on youtube, get out to hear music." EPA!

average user!

GNU / Linux is for you!!

links:

http://tiorubo.blogspot.com ......
http://peluffon.blogspot.com/2006/04/microsoft_02.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/
http: / / www.caravantes.com / humor / pringao.htm
http://www.openxml.info/


But ... There are programs for GNU / Linux?

Yes! and galore !!!!. Now, let's make a table of equivalence of programs at this time come to my mind, programs for the average user:

----------------- Internet Explorer Mozilla Firefox Windows Media Player
Amarok
----------- ----------- Windows Media Player Mplayer, VLC, Totem
------------ Emule
Amule ------------------------ ---------------- Bittorrent Bittorrent, BitTornado, KTorrent, Azureus -----------------------------
AMSN MSN, Gaim, Nero
Pidgim ------------ ----------------- K3B
Paint - ......... (Do not you realize that the paint is the same crap from Windows 3.11?)
Photoshop ----------------------- The Gimp

Soundforge Audacity Pro Tools ---------------------- -------------------- MS Office Ardour
---- ------------------------ ------------ OpenOffice.org
Adobe Premier ------ Kino, Cinelerra

in case, I leave a couple of links of equivalents.

links:
http://www.linuxalt.com/
http://alts.homelinux.net/
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/
http://www . amsn-project.net /
http://azureus.sourceforge.net/
http://sourceforge.net/
http://www.gimp.org/
http:/ / audacity.sourceforge.net /
http://ardour.org/
http://www.amule.org/
http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/
http://www.openoffice. org /


But I have a Gforce 9999999999999FX ...¡¡¡¡ 35151 with 1GB of RAM and Linux FaxModem and no games!

Nothing could be farther from reality. No games on Linux. Nostalgic for M $, there is even a free version of Minesweeper. But there are many games for Linux. And it is always the possibility that work on Wine. Wine (Wine Is Not an Emulator) runs pretty good programs Windows on Linux. Eye, is not miraculous, is a project still in development but I can play Warcraft 3 online quite well, for example. The Wine is not just for games, also for all kinds of programs. The compatibility and performance of Windows programs run by Wine are detailed in the database homepage.

links http://www.ubuntugames.org/

http://www.winehq.com/
http://www.linuxjuegos.com/


Linux is ugly Windows is prettier

This is another lie by chance in the last years does not make sense. The three most popular desktop GNU / Linux are in their default versions, many more colorful and pleasing in appearance than any version of Windows. And if this is not sufficient for you, are 100% configurable. And if that's not enough for you, you have programs such as Compiz and Beryl (and the merger of both the Compiz Fusion) and return to your desktop absolutely amazing and leave the Vista Aero very outdated, as well as wasteful of resources (Note : compiz appeared, at least a year before Vista).

links http://www.beryl-project.org/

http://www.kde.org/
http://www.xfce.org/ Http://www.gnome.org/

http://www.gnome-look.org/


I have a USB modem and I have fear ... Who can help?


communities and forums for GNU / Linux on the Internet. Is full. Just open a browser and Google put, for example, "Debian AMD64 Flash" and I'll instantly have thousands of websites that address the issue. In the case of the USB modem is a barrier that I experienced firsthand, but I got over myself in the footsteps of a couple of guides I found on Google. I recently found one in particular, the mentally termed as "the HOWTO final to connect to internet with USB modem from GNU / Linux. "There is always a forum, there is always someone with the same problem, ever. The solution is to find.


http://foro.lugmen.org.ar links / viewtopic.php? t = 40
http://www.ubuntu-es.org/
http://www.esdebian.org/

http://www.google.com

What do I need to get started?

download any ISO (CD image) of any distribution. I recommend to have a first contact, which installs Ubuntu. You can try the same installation CD without taking a single mega your disk Live Cd drive via USB modem If you have, I got what the guide says before doing anything and copy on a diskette or CD-RW or leave it in a hard partition. After installation, I recommend that you download Automatix to tune it and give you a little walk by Getdeb to mob some of the programs that you have to go down. Also, you can give a tour of all the links I left above.



links http://www.getdeb.net/
http://www.getautomatix.com/
http://www.vivalinux.com.ar/

course, if really interests you install it, let me know. And I'll help you install it. I bet you'll like.
;)

Cookbook Templates For Bloggers

Quete! a reflective night before and after Quete

Today was a Sunday like any other. At least for me, a young student from Cs. Communication, as I am a young fan of music, film, literature, women (rather one), any young man in the province of Buenos Aires. To address this side of the Creek and General Paz. A Sunday that began after a Saturday night and continued just after 3 pm when I got to eat. With his pajamas, I started to see how the download was the Debian via Bittorrent. Nothing, still missing two days ... the last five. Then came go to "bolishopping" to change nosequé and I felt like going to buy a couple of movies on DVD. We went with my mom and my cousin. I bought Amelie, Delicatessen, Mutant Action, Scarface and a Led Zeppelin concert. My cousin bought 300, Saw 3 and Iwoshima letters (I think that is written, I'm not sure and I have no desire to check, will excuse my last cigarette and cold and the few willing to walk ten meters back and forth to check a simple spelling error.) So far, a Sunday like any other. I first want to review data via internet at about 10 pm. Macri 40% 60% Filmus. O 39.5%, and is pleased to announce Seprin. 32% of abstention, 6% of blank and null votes, something like 38% of the city that did not care at all what you were elected today (38% fought him hand to hand the first to Macri, who with 41% of the real pattern has less legitimacy than the Smurf Henry or the Chupacabra). Or rather, 38% of the eligible voting population to the point of expressing interest in not voting or voting "negative." No surprise with the result. The surveys, which generally do not believe a damn or, rather, they downplayed, the winner gave almost identical Macri resulted in the first round. Let's look well, 45% of voters (porcetantaje decrease in relation to the total census) and assumed that all was lost. Ok, if the 38% (abstentions, blank votes, null and challenged), had gone to vote against the right macrista had won Filmus. But ... why do we always have to choose between different versions right?. I've read in several places, seen too many posters, accusing the left of pandering to the right. Vamosss, my fellow Peronist and progressivism, we do not play anyone, hardly even exist!, However (here I use bold, as it does not really know why, the Clarín), functional units are right . Be consistent: until the day that all you cease to follow the line of nefarious characters as D'Elia or do not do social work for the leaders or leading the PJ, we'll never make a revolution in Argentina. Perhaps many of you are not interested in the Revolution, those who do: not come together with people who do not want revolution!. Perhaps pcs. believe it is viable to the Revolution from Peronism (and by that I mean the device Peronist party and the leaders historically sold) but we affirm today, and I will always continue to affirm, as a government support the one who works and Alberto Anibal Fernandez, Julio De Vido, a government mouth is full of symbolism "national and popular" and has not lifted a finger to nationalize YPF, telecommunications, gas, railways and even fill out mouth against "neoliberalism" and awarded without competition, the railroad Concessions Roca, like Menem, Alfonsin and the military with Alfredo Yabran, never, ever, going to be one step closer to the Revolution.

I understand it, Altamira, PTS and other sects. I understand perfectly. But also understand units: Néstor Kirchner. We need each other, brothers and sisters. We're not going anywhere without PC and PC do not go anywhere without us. You may want to go to where their leaders (and not the bases) is where you are today: in power. But not just any power, colleagues, comrades, are bourgeois power. Many will say "and yes, but we must build." And I fully agree, but build without owing anything to anyone. Is it right to obtain a government position to deliver our critical thinking and for a exhasperada defense of a government so openly pro-imperialist, but to fill his cheeks against the IMF and the ease of their financial situation by paying an illegitimate debt?. Perhaps in the revolutionary struggle, the end justifies the means?. Does we learned nothing from the past?. Or, rather, is because we live in the Age of Globalization of pragmatism without principles?.

While the text is entitled as a night that works as a turning point, in fact, the change occurred during the first round to take Macri actually occur when the quartermaster. It is interesting to see how Argentina is the only country in the world where a municipality influence elections nationwide. Or at least that's what the media says. I am sure everywhere (if not today and they were saying), this date was black for President Kirchner. The former had also been for Carrio. Although, of course, today ARI won the governorship of a province, which, beyond the number of people voting, we are talking of a province. How is it possible to speak of Macri as opposition leader having won a municipal election? Why never referred to it as opposed to the mayors of Cordoba and Rosario? Or to the Slaughter?. A reality that saddens me as Argentina's national media as the assumptions are, indeed, means locals. And yet, to be given National status to municipal status. "Insecurity is something that concerns us all Argentines? NO!. Where are the thieves?. In Capital and Greater Buenos Aires. What where they are the villas?. Throughout the country. But what place enrich drug dealers selling to villeros paco, Where reside the union bureaucrats, politicians are more corrupt and larger businesses?. Corruption is exported to the rest of the country, OK., But here you have the drug, the pointer politician, the corrupt cop, the union bureaucrat who is president of a club or have contacts with hooligan (and most major Clubs the country are ... Capital and Greater Buenos Aires), the mobster and nosequé more, even all in one person. Have you ever any of the neighbors began to think that increasing crime is directly proportional to the enrichment of mafias?. When a mob is enriched by drug trafficking and smuggling, assaults millionaires, and other shady business (theft of public funds by private bribes paid to obtain bids, decrees, laws or ordinances that favor) results:

* Increased highly addictive drug addicts, including cocaine and its derivatives, and glue. We all know the method: someone, often a pointer, often the owner of a nightclub, a businessman, someone Falopa begins to give a kid. The kid is crazy, it feels more broadly because it rubs shoulders with a powerful and becomes addicted to the substance X. But when it comes to mafia, they are all investment / favors and so the kid who thought he would give him Falopa wave ends up becoming a criminal. Thus, there is an army of marginalized addicts, thanks to the enrichment of the Mafia.
* The increase of corruption, officials of both major, medium and small, police, military. There is no better investment in the business world to invest in politics. Because the laws are bought, just ask Daniel Hadad and the magical Decree of Necessity and Urgency signed by Carlos Saul Menem to CONSEDE the radio airwaves National Radio 10. Ask everyone who is overly rich Thanks to the alleged attacks of September 11 and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq .... and all the wars and attacks in the entire history of mankind.

insecurity increases from the hand of the gangs that are enriched by the corruption of public officials and personnel of the FFSS and military. The country is shaped according to the business of the mafia because it is ruled by gangsters .... or business people and business. And here comes the joke for all the locals: how the hell is going to reduce crime (because insecurity is more a feeling created by the media, the offenses are the concrete actions) of the municipality of Buenos Aires a mayor Entrepreneur?. They had learned nothing, jerks!. From ancient times to today, no company has not paid a bribe, and most obviously, over the past decade, not only in our beloved country but across the world. A political campaign financed with private funds is the most old and of course there is. From the Roman Empire to the present day Global Capitalism and the End of the Nation-State-Nation Company, politicians financed his rise to power using the resources of people with big business interests. The difference between Modernity and the rest of the story is that during slavery and the Middle Ages, only the characters were politicians of the ruling classes. With the Revolution Industrial Capitalism and the rise of liberal democracy and paved the way, after being granted political rights to the entire population (beginning of XX century, obviously, after the threat of communism in some countries will be mitigated), and offered the opportunity to workers and workers, the proletariat, of politicization. Then, the magic formula of "uncertainty is over when it ends with the hungry and educate the people" is false, first because, as I said above, insecurity is a feeling, a feeling created by the media communication transmitting news related to crime selfishly, but not real crimes committed by those above, but for the crimes of the parsley below. The real murderer is not committing the crime, pulling the trigger, which plunges a knife, the real murderer is the one that leads to other human beings to kill each other. The bourgeoisie, those are the murderers. Those who say that competition is good, these are the murderers. Those who enrich themselves at the expense of millions of people, those are the murderers. Those who manufacture guns and bombs, these are the murderers. The blood filling the words Liberty, Nation, Democracy, Peace, these are the murderers. Applicants who meet the planet undernourished, ecological disasters, drug addicts, these are the murderers. Those who got rich during the decade of 90 'leading the country the worst of its crisis, the crisis of cacerolazo, pickets, dead and malnourished on television, these are the murderers. The offense is going to end the day is completed with the power and the ideology of the bourgeoisie. The feeling of insecurity can be reduced in two ways:

* Changing the way of delivering the news about crimes
* With "sense of security", ie more police, more guns, more FFSS and budget for the armed forces, with Mano Dura (News of crimes that end with a police hero ... or what really is the tough repression, trigger happy, genocide of a class that is not to blame the world where you live), with companies Security install private "booths" in the corners of the houses (like an asshole with a stick can compete against a pair of jets with a Ak57 and an Uzi), and of course, all the richer for these increases pose to companies engaged in safety or the safety production inputs.

Macri won, won the heavy hand, earned the mafia, the feast of privatization and tenders. They won the murderers. And 60% of the locals voted today (and those who are in favor and not vote) are accomplices to murder

After reading the story sung of 60-40, accompanied, with my family, my cousin to do their obligations. On the trip from West Creek to access, by the General Paz, said aloud: "on the left side can see the region of the Peronist apparatus. The Capital, to the Right."

And so, at the end of this discussion that talks about a before and after, a turning point, we should clarify that we are not talking about the triumph of Macri. The triumph of the right is no change, rather, is the line that began when the oligarchy used every means at its disposal to put in front of the Cabildo to Cornelio Saavedra. Macri is a Saavedra, a Rock, a Menem, a De La Rua. The president of the national and international bourgeoisie. And I know that my words will sound pessimistic and maybe at some extent demoralized, perhaps because of all the effort really start to inject each sentence. I say and say and ask and ask me not to look down, let us not feel defeated by something we already knew and has several years of history. Because despite all our thoughts that fell from our eyes as tears to feel the injustice that surrounds us, the turning point has not yet arrived. Because despite all the bad times we had to live, we have not been defeated. Because 60% to 40% is hardly a real, not counting those under 18 must also hate Macri, excluding the rest of the country, all of our vast country is not a defeat. It's just another trip in a long list of trips that sometimes seems it will not be endless but we have to stop it ourselves. Because the capital is just a grain of our country. Neuquen is a boil, if you want. But not the whole country, not us. And while we are and we want and do and get together and do and let us fucking around and do, all change is possible. Because we have to work to create the tipping point. Because only we can fight the "before" to construct the turning point and thus make possible an after ours.

Platypus Flosser What Stores

! There are no more of

There are no more balls
Eskorbuto-election
to live happy and contented
Eskorbuto Parliament.

So, a song by the punk band Eskobar. And was thinking about it later, but I never had to.

In a country where the political class is not renewed, where for decades is associated with more shady business with gangsters, bribery and corruption in a country like Argentina, located on the continent to fight hand hand with Africa in the most exploited and most downtrodden (because, for that matter, in Africa sepoys tyrants govern international power in South America Land of countries that achieved independence in the nineteenth century, its leaders did nothing but deliver independence), we need a change. One or more, rather. Because we live our lives dominated by commercial interests and speculation of a social class did not hesitate to set up dictatorships, kickbacks / tighten the turn to political power to make public their debts, or to establish laws that benefit them safely . Because we say in Creole, we are Seat Cushin all day. And in December of 2001, as in many occasions, were and are aware of the penetration. Because that's basically what happens to us, we enter in the ass, penetrates us power in the ass to indulge his desire to possess everything. Because in a world where the accumulation is the law, have everything and own everything and everyone, is the biggest prize. And that is the reality of the countries that were born the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as part of the bourgeois revolutions. It is the reality of the world: a few owning the rest. Owning the world does not mean being the biggest landowner, have many companies, getting the highest number of conseciones, houses, fields, cars, yachts, planes, plasma televisions, jewelry, relics, works of art. Owning the world means to possess. Possess us. Owning the world means to own the fate of the bulk of mankind. So we are dominated by the U.S., because if the gringos occur to them that they have weapons of mass destruction, or plan them, or any other excuse, we will possess, not because we already possess, because we already own, but because maybe sometime reborn in this land that mind-independence, revolutionary. And history shows us: The Liberating Revolution against Peronism and the 1976 military coup against the threat of a Socialist Revolution in the Pampas are only a sample of power showing who is the male who penetrates. A friend who went to Canada, told me yesterday that he probably was a coward for having fled the country, to which I replied "no, because in Canada you are also Seat Cushin, only with local anesthesia. "As in the 90's, when the state changed Burgues Argentine coins for the people and extraordinary bribes to" the political / union "the little sovereignty we had on our wealth: YPF, Gas State, Entel, Segba, rail, Aerolineas Argentinas, etc. Thank God, a bad move penetrators made us realize the fucks in December 2001. However, not reached. Duhalde won the tug of war and established in power with no votes (including the 4 that preceded it). And here we are, 6 years later, in the Kirchner government. Again, corruption is top of every newspaper. Corruption is linked again with the government. As in Brazil. The megapublicitado economic growth is not just a product of the devaluation (which was expensive before exporting it, goes very cheap now, therefore, is exported more) and no one, absolutely no citizen is benefited by it, except of course, the national bourgeoisie and political power. Inflation is again imminent. Inflation is nothing more than speculation, something out of a market economy governed by the fictitious rules of supply and demand, with each price inflated costs for more profit. And notice the irony of all this, as the bourgeoisie blames inflation to increased pay. How the hell is going to consume more when prices rise unchecked and wage increases are fictitious, while the largest amount of taxes is for consumers?. As such, the megapublicitado economic growth is not reflected in the street, there are still large numbers of unemployed or employed in jobs such as CallCenters unhealthy, the cardboard was multiplied, there are still street children (increasingly) that for years are addicted to paco (who will be the drug dealers?), thereby increasing crime to mantain the habit and thus leave Macri candidates (one of the biggest beneficiaries of the 90's, owner of routes nationwide) to fight against insecurity when the same policies that benefited those who made it "criminal" rather human beings who will trample all your rights, no future, fell on hard drugs and became addicted and they had no other to go out and steal.

The political class is not for decades, since he departed to Belgrano and Saavedra Moreno, bourgeois who get into government to do business and promoted themselves. So Peronism caused so much horror. So Peronism became Lopez Rega, Menem, Duhalde, Moyano, Daer and Kirchner. Business. Power. As long as this kind of politics, the country will continue kneeling penetrated. Unions are nothing more than what they were since its inception and Trade Unions in England, Negoce off workers, are trading power. The left does not exist: no party has a program, because if they would be united, fighting for the same cause. His program is the self-proclaimed "we are the revolutionaries, you do not" and the appropriation of popular struggles to "we struggled here, There and anywhere." The only thing that matters is to maintain a minimum share of power, so the Labor Party traded with employers, while James Gima out in the program Grondona, the PTS, the MST, Socialist Convergence and demases, not because they want to unify the Revolution. And if tomorrow, magically becomes the Revolution (as the parties do not give a damn to make the revolution, but rather by swelling their ranks), will go just as in the USSR under Stalin: the one with the power is going to eliminate their opponents to remain in power because, but are able to tolerate the differences now and work together for the same cause, why tomorrow will tolerate opposition?. And right ....¿ what can be said of the right if we suffer for centuries that?. The mockery of the people, that Macri's candidacy, may come in June if he wins the election. No programs, no ideologies, or rather there is a program or an ideology to defend our sovereignty and fight for the interests of the Argentine people. So change is needed.

And as more balls are not
Maybechiapas-election
to live happy and contented
Maybechiapas parliament.


Without self-proclaimed no interest more than the common good, with weapons that the word tolerance and true democracy (ie, zero tolerance to those with unpopular ideas), I am running as a candidate to that is: Chairman, Deputy, Mayor, Governor, Councillor, City, whatever. The government program, a program open to anyone to read and to add measures consistent with the common good, would more or less like this:

* Nationalization of all privatized in the late 90's. This can add a federal enabling act to nationalize other companies deemed strategic (not renobables natural resources like water, mining, etc.). Or do not follow the law and respect for workers. Any state enterprise is to be controlled by their workers. All decisions will be taken from the ground and the surplus will be used to invest in the company or to anyone in need. There will be a fixed wage for all workers, that there will be a fixed rate for each hour worked, unless overtime and if some workers do tasks unhealthy. Shall be fixed according to the basket.

* Tax Reform: The lower the consumption tax proporcianal way to increase income tax for those earning more than the basket. Tax shall also apply to large landowners, large landowners Property for sale.

* Increased Health budget. Also implement a plan for all hospitals and private clinics moved into the hands of the state and controlled by workers. Also nationalized pharmaceutical companies and not be paid a single weight for drug patents.

* Increase the budget for Science and Technology for the development of our own techniques to combat dependency.

* Increase the education budget. It nationalized all primary and secondary schools, colleges and universities. Education is not a business, no one should benefit from this form.

* All nationalization will not pay any compensation. Account shall be taken only pay compensation to companies or associations throughout history were not equal gains at the expense of the company / association today. The valuation of these companies will be able to state and private make an assessment of its own that will not have much effect at the time of transfer.

* will be carried out gradually, land reform so that everyone who is interested in the activity has his piece of land. The first expropriations are to unproductive estates today.

* working hours will be reduced to 6 hours. The salary of 6 hours will equal the cost of the basket for all employees. The market basket is measured in proportion to the production of wealth across the country, as well as the costs of goods and inputs. The work will never be considered as a cost, but what it really is: an investment of all so that everyone benefits.

* It decriminalize drug use, because it was shown that the ban does not lower the number of consumers and that decriminalization will only increase. Because consumers are not criminals and should never be paid with criminal records to a person who has every right to choose a path that does not harm the rest. To prevent the use of hard drugs (such as cocaine and heroin derivatives and) be continuous awareness campaigns. As also will raise awareness of alcohol and snuff, but not the use of cannabis.

* It will stimulate the development of Software, Hardware, Knowledge Free Culture and the entire national territory. In that sense, chau WTO and intellectual property laws of shit. Directly, it will prohibit the use of Windows in government agencies and schools and be taught the advantages of Free Software. Be invested in hardware industry with the ultimate goal of self-sufficiency.

* It nationalized all channels of Television & Radio and Hand workers pass. It will encourage the installation of Community Media. I vote for making a referendum to oust Tinelli, Suar, Pergollini, Hadad, and Rial Feimann the country, is Copan?.


Constitutional Reform:

* There will be a binding referendum to reform the Constitution. If approved, it will hold a Constituent Assembly where he wants to be able to participate (registration) to rate topics. With the constitutional reform, it will dissolve the Senate, since its origin in the U.S. as an assimilation of the House of Lords of Great Betraña no sense in a country like ours without nobility. It will increase the number of seats in the National Assembly (as will be renamed to Representatives), to ensure greater pluraridad in the chamber and thus open the way for the representation of minorities. National Assembly elections will be held every 4 years and may revoke the mandates, there will be a representative every certain number of inhabitants. There will be elections every 4 years for representatives of the Provincial Assembly. Its representatives will be elected in each county by an election and there will be a representative every few inhabitants. The difference with the old model is that the Council will be deliberating body of delegates elected by local assemblies. Neighborhood Assemblies may be called at any time and are different grout Neighborhood Assemblies to be formed in each district. These will be the backbone of the People, the reform of the state, the handover of power of the bourgeoisie to the worker. Each Assembly shall deal with various issues that will Neighborhood Assembly led to the Neighborhood, the Deliberative Council, the Provincial Assembly to the National Assembly. Every citizen who decides to run (over 18) can not make any campaign. His biography will be published in different places and that's the only information voters have to choose, since they will not be more than representatives of the various assemblies.

* There will be elections for the appointment of Judges of all kinds. Every jury trial shall be elected by the community.


Other:

* There will be purges in FF.SS., Armed Forces and Intelligence Services in order to get rid of individuals who have a history and linked with criminal groups from power. There will be a reform in the curricula of FF.SS. and the armed forces, related to the importance of Democracy, Justice, Social Equality. There will be elections for the positions to rank. Trials will be those linked to the dictatorship. The penalty is life imprisonment and I will shut up in ordinary prisons.

* A corrupt and mafiosi: life imprisonment.

Well ... two hours ago and I am with this ...... q Q

not take me seriously .... but my candidacy for the Assembly and other burned my brain. Whoever wants to contribute something, so be it.

Maybechiapas 2007 ... 2011, 2015, 2019 ... etc

votenme.

Can You Take Nyquil With Augmentin

Quete Cojones! Quete

Some time ago I read somewhere that said it was for John Lennon Imagine his attempt to write the Communist Manifesto Pop song version, which left me no choice but to smile. After several years of reading notes on various interviews John Lennon and Yoko him and I realized that comment was right. Basically, when you hear Imagine receiving an invitation to think about a utopia, that is, to think about a world that is not, in isolation, but from this. An invitation to criticize the world we have, because utopia is the world we do not have. The great thing Imagine it's like with a few sentences describing what for many is Communism, which at least should be, not the Stalinist states were no more than bad publicity (and many murders and aberrations against communism through).

And now I invite you to imagine a situation in terms of mere possibility. Imagine Lennon with a guitar standing in front of a microphone, singing Imagine. The place can be Heaven, but if we talk about communism that would be contradictory. Better would be to imagine the importance, the legacy he left us or leave us tried John to life. We could take the legacy of Father Lennon (Beautiful Boy) or love Lennon (Woman) but more importantly I think it is to imagine the flesh Lennon singing Imagine, the political Lennon, who invited who can hear to think a new world. And in the middle of the song out of nowhere, Lenin appears to play the guitar .... Do not you think that makes sense?.

And if I can not imagine .... watch this video please!

How To Hack Sidekick Lx Unlimited

Imagine! Who's who Mailing: Argument vs. Opinion

This text is intended for all human beings have an opinion. Women and men who have "educated opinion" on any aspect of everyday life and not daily. Those people who think about Riquelme on films about politics, about sex, about drugs, music and more. The opinion is an expression of respect. As all manifestation of meaning, the opinion is a speech (as seen from a perspective veroniana, but of course, 10% of you reading know who Veron, the rest not so has been the lesson of semiotics). What we need to discern is what kind of speech. First, we must explain in simple language what is a discourse, that is, an expression of respect. Anything can be speech, because anything can tell someone something. For example, the shit, by color, texture, smell and consistency you can find out about food and health individual digestive deposited in the world that piece of shit. But let us not fuss, let us refer to refer to as discourses (just this once) to the production of meaning in human beings. Well, Call it a day they send you to write your opinion about the picketers. Here you have a speech for analysis. But what the hell is the speech opinion?. According to Veron, all speech recognition sense in other speeches, this means that all manifestation of meaning is marked (literally) for other languages. Call it, if I have to do a research about the carnival as a practice of popular resistance in the nineteenth century, I have to inform on that object. I have to read me all similar work or who speak of that object that are within my reach. Let's say that once I read it all and begin to create my own discourse about the carnival, which I will be doing is a particular vision of the nineteenth century carvanales. That is, I'll be talking about the object from a given time and space. From a sector of society, a time of life, a difficult week, a particular mood (Call it my old I threw the coffee on accidentally before starting to write.) When writing my speech about the carnival as a practice of resistance in the nineteenth century, I will be marked by all these factors. Indeed, perhaps because he is a fan of Rock festival, making a comparison between two objects. Even if right could say that Carnival is not a practice of resistance but downtime in which workers do not give a shit and put into fart and blablabla. All discourse is marked by other discourses (this too). But what is the difference between research in academic and everyday life view?. First, does my work for the power I have to cite the authors in which I relied to write. I have to quote correctly, but I can eat a lawsuit for plagiarism. In everyday life that does not pass, you do not walk around quoting what he says because it is virtually impossible (as it is impossible to give 100% all the speeches that I relied to do the job) to be conscious about what I draw to say that. But there is another difference that is a consequence of the first. Is not the same build on scientific research in scientific discourse as Pepe said, what I read in the newspaper once or saw in a movie. Academic work is marked by the academy itself. Instead, a speech either daily life is based on common sense. If we ask Rosa about the carnival as a practice of popular resistance in the nineteenth century it is likely that say nothing or say that the soldiers forbade the last dictatorship (and in this case would be smarter Rosa). But if you asked Rosa about Kirchner, on Bush, Chavez on Macri, about music, movies, drugs, etc.., Will have much to say (at least to be shy, if so, we serve a glass of Brandy and was). Why? Because we live in a constant barrage of information by the mass media. One may object ... is information. Yes, but it is information that is discourse and discourse is marked by another speech and ultimately is marked by the speech "political-economic interest" of the owner the media.

First conclusion: the opinion is a discourse that recognizes sense primarily on common sense. And if anything they are the media and other ideological apparatuses (such as school, church and family) are shapers of common sense. Common sense is not knowledge, not science, but is rather a bunch of prejudices and other atrocities that we use to interact with the capitalist world in which we live. Common sense helps us to know that the bank may have to queue as well as to not set fire to the operators of our heads because it is "bad."

Second conclusion: A Speech "academic" recognizes the conditions of production (which recognizes the speeches sense) in itself. The opinion shows itself as one speech on the subject, and that at no time recognized meaning in other languages. Imagine two Jehovah's Witnesses that you will touch the bell and say "hello, we are Jehovah's Witnesses, we want you to join us and give us money every month so we can continue to use cute outfits and break the rest of cherries neighborhood "instead of saying that God is good and what do I know that shit. Or that I say "I am a Marxist, I want to make the revolution" and then read all my texts (and as you see, I am a Marxist and I want to make the Revolution is something that I deal). That is, when one believes, is taking over, but common sense plays.

Third conclusion: if one had knowledge of X, each X talk about not giving his opinion but that would be sharing and building knowledge about X. The opinion does nothing but play and deeper sense, bourgeois ideology. The opinion is not what one thinks, one has to think before you say what you think, and the view is not to say what others say. And if you do not believe me, next time someone says something, ask what the hell it is based and will see how it will begin to falter.

Fourth Conclusion: The opinion is not knowledge. The opinion is ignorance. The opinion is the speech that appears in the middle of a talk about X and you have no idea what q is talking but heard something somewhere. One as you do not know, give your opinion. Rather than sit and listen, learn, give your opinion.

Overall conclusion: I'm studying social Universidad de Buenos Aires. That means I study and I have knowledge about certain things, basically social. Both my uncles are engineers. My aunt and my old doctor. When it comes to engineering or medicine, I am a listener. But when it comes to politics, society, culture and the world all agree. And that's something I hate. The opinion is ignorance. And in reliance on relativism, first you say "my opinion is valid" and then I branded as authoritarian. And there I think is the bottom line. Knowledge, knowledge, culture itself, are also tools and belongings that are not distributed equally in society. There are people who have little interest and that they are middle class and have access to certain cultural property. Cumbia sucks and is for ignorant ... obvious, because they hear the least cultural property received. Sure, and I, a student from Cs. Social authoritarian brand as me just because there is an unequal distribution among those with assets and there is a power relationship. If PC. study dentistry and love to spit their prejudices (ie the recovery of X before a trial and all that that implies ... that is the view, you say what you think of something you did not understand or jot about something), to I do not break balls. If you like to talk about life, he studied philosophy. If you want to talk about because X is as it is studying Psychology, etc. Even if you mean what you think, I first thought. Investigate, read, let yourself be guided by those who know more.

This text is to express my hatred of all the ignorant people who talk about things that do not know and think is the absolute truth when he discussed a one passes studying these things to pass subjects at the university. DEATH

IGNORANCE

How Do You Jailbreak A Sidekick 08 For Aim

Quete! reading of the seven o'clock

Monday, seven o'clock reading

Club, I found an interesting phrase of the second vice president of the National Assembly of Venezuela, Roberto Hernandez:

"fight against capitalism, because is an irrational system that threatens to destroy the planet. It is a scientific truth that the planet is threatened. "

is something I'd always thought. Capitalism kills. But ... Why?. Because the private interest and profit maximization are not only the cause of alienation and exploitation of all human beings, but also the planet. The market economy, liberal, does not limit the looting of natural resources, in fact, encouraged. Stimulates industrial production without taking into account the environmental damage that the constant production for 24 hours, 365 days a year will make life on planet Earth. The liberal economy is an orgy, is chaos. "Economy" basically means management, a methodology for the management and production of goods for the benefit of society as a whole. That is "Economics." However, during the last two hundred years (and, of course), we showed that the economy serves to enrich a few and impoverishing the majority, the economy is legal and illegal, there are wars mafia is smuggling, there are all kinds of dirty business who are interested in little or no public benefit. Economics is rationalizing production and distribution. The capitalist economy is the opposite. Capitalism is death. Today more than ever we must be aware of it. Global warming and environmental catastrophes (oil spills, deforestation, erosion, chemicals that affect the ozone layer, destroying the ecosystem, etc..) Are phenomena that we should not stop thinking. Ideology Bourgeois makes us think that the world is always one and is divided into months, and always will be the same, our life is the same as our old life and that's the biggest lie of all. Bourgeois ideology denies the dialectic of planet earth. There are chemical changes, physical and biological agents produced by the actions of man. And that is something we must fight for change. The only way to save the life of our dear Mother Earth, is through a planned economy, an economy that is not interested in free trade and competition (things that interested them the bourgeoisie as a class during the feudal and today are universal truths no sense, only made sense in the context of the bourgeois revolutions), a socialist planned economy (and that Keynesianism in their own thesis understands the economy in free-market cycles and planning), an economy that is only interested in the common good.

Capitalism kills the man and kills the planet. And this is a scientific truth. There is no worse

denial denial to the dialectic today

two ends (end, end) to the story: the murderer and the dialectical overcoming, because, as Marx said, history is the history of class struggle and the story will end upon completion of the operation and mastery of a class by another. Karl Marx

Thanks for giving man the tools of science and scientists always to overthrow this production, in this culture, this "serial murderer who has the keys of all the prisons."


SOCIALISM OR DEATH

Gay Crusing Spot In Ohio

Quete! Biblical

not be scared, I was watching a video about handling the media and this showed Venezuela as Chavez allegedly created a new faith from Christianity ... all they did was decontextualise phrases and assemble a note which demonizes the so-called Socialism of the XXI Century,

In a speech, Chavez responded to a cardinal, then read:

Acts, April 32-37


Union of faithful believers
All had one heart and one mind, and nobody called any thing very few possess, but they had all things common. Testimnonio gave the apostles in the strongest of the resurrection of Jesus the Lord. And everyone enjoyed great sympathy. There was between them destitute, because those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the price of goods sold, put it at the apostles' feet and they distributed to each according to his needs. Joseph called by the apostles Barnabas, which means son of consolation " Levite, Cypriot nation, had a field, sold it, brought the money and put it at the feet of the apostles.

After reading these verses, Chavez said:

"This is not socialism, cardinal, this is common" jajajaja



seems something to be shared

Gpsphone Cheats Pokemon Orange

Quete Appointment! for I will not stop living

few months ago I wanted to write something in a prayer to exclaim something like "when you're 22." I wanted to take a picture of my ideas, sensations and feelings of young Argentine, the south of Gran Buenos Aires (that part of the country which is neither capital nor the interior), a student of Communication at the University of Buenos Aires, handed, musician, writer hint of 22 years. Save a text a piece of me, a little bit of my soul, something that within a few years back to read and think about what I am at this point in my life. Therefore, I will proceed to leave a piece of my soul this morning, Sunday, February 4, 2007 at eight o'clock.

When one is twenty years is something like the Gran Buenos Aires, a stage of life where there is not a place or another, but rather in a sort of limbo time between what was and what will be. First, I make it clear that I personally feel that way, some people I know are or behind or beyond, but not my case, I'm in the middle, I am neither one thing nor the another. This is a strange feeling to have 22, one feels compelled to think about the future. And I think it costs a lot. If there is something that I always felt is the fear of reaching a certain age and discover that you became something else. To illustrate, I quote a friend who once said something like, "do you remember when we were left-handed?" (Referring to an encounter with an acquaintance in the future.) And that is my fear, to wake up one day and say "Oh God, what have I done?". Stop being me, of wanting what I want to turn into an average employee who criticized the country from his chair and tell the young things like "I was your age too well, but the world is another thing." Finally, murder. Killing all that I am. In other words, die. My biggest fear is that 22 years: Dying.

Moreover, there is the solitude. In 2006 I was feeling like a little bit for some time had been my daily routine was crumbling. I began to feel I was alone. The inside will want to move to the Capital and the Capital would not pull through. And I here in the Greater Buenos Aires, feeling more and more tortuous travel at 112 to the faculty. I am no longer so easy in others as a while, if at some point I could find. It was so easy to construct a time to share moments. So easy to get an hour of the night in the home and place our humanities Nosequien in different sectors, listening to music which gradually became a list of topics that today myself exhausted me, bores me. And sharing a night of nothing. And live every minute like every other minute but with a sense of belonging, time for me, for you, for us, our times, which no longer exists. The time is no longer ours. There is no time except for a waste of neurons ethyl a Saturday night, something which is not time. It is time for time is eternal, is a variable that one has for anything. The time of the weekend, the time of the hours between the arrival of the Capital at the time of sleep, no more than a spending and savings if you spend not accumulate. Because if there is something that distinguishes what is now I am no longer accumulated time, time for X, all the time in the world. And that is one of the reasons why I have what I fear to loneliness. Somehow, the gleaning me to stay in Buenos Aires and manage time in a way that allows me to continue being myself. But I find nothing. And that's a feeling that today I can not escape, but hardly the rare moments where I can find another.

I think from age 15 onwards if there is anything I did was listen to music. Since I woke up I was going to sleep, even while sleeping, there was music. At 22 he started to not have that need music. I have fear that it is a symptom of change so much rejection, but I think it is otherwise. The music was always linked to a contextualization of the music of one point in my life. The 22 looks like a silent movie. Not that there are situations, but found that these situations have their own music. However, the practice of "listening" has become a practice similar to that to me means "read a book." There are people who read all day. That when they finish a book, start reading another. Those people I never understood. I need to be in a state of mind to read a book. And I could not finish one and start another one because I need time to digest. Personally I need to find a time to read. I can not conceive the idea of \u200b\u200breading all the time because they feel that reading would be a simple action. An action in which one is always one and pass such books the world go out the window of the bus. With music, I feel the same. I need to find the time in which I want to listen. Otherwise, all you would be doing is spending power.

Maybe my problem is I do not want to accept that "I have to." But ... I have what?. The only "I have to" of what is sure to receive, but not because I have but I want. And as with music, I need to find my time to study, to go to college. I can not force myself to do, not enjoy it. It becomes a torment. I feel everything "I have to" is torture. I wonder, is it so difficult to find work that allows us to continue being who we are. Why we need to spend more if we had none before? (Or had but we did the jerks). The capitalist world forces us to sell our labor power to survive, ok, but in exchange for what? Do we really need all that the world has to give? (Or rather, that the capitalist economy has to give ... that needs constant demonstration of creating ...). Can we survive what we are claiming? I think so. Hence arise various personal projects that I share with others. Thank God, guys, we have them!. But we must be aware that our projects are performing only reason for us to survive and remain. Juan Yesterday I said something like "Adapt the system." That's what we have to avoid. Adaptation is a double-edged trap involves a transformation, a transformation that background is just an ideological transformation. You have to understand the rules and must use those rules against the system. Have a radio show, laburos, let's put forward. Edit your journal. Let a producer of content. Whatever. Everything takes work, obviously, but also involve jobs that allow us the opportunity to remain ourselves. That's the idea, dude. Bah, the idea is the Revolution. But the Revolution have all the time in the world. You have to survive but not stop living.

life at age 22 is just a place to vindicate. And not just life at age 22, but rather a lifetime. Claimed. Be yourself. Because that's the sad thing about all this. Can not be yourself. You can not. Life is divided into months and climbed employees every month as if they were steps. Steps where, I wonder ... if we laburando until we retire and there are already too old to enjoy life. Life in capitalism is the negation of the material reproduction of life. Live but you're not. I'm not going to stop living. I'm not going to stop living. I'm not going to stop living. I'm not going to stop living.

All this thinking of the 22 I keep thinking of the 23 (because apparently, I needed to be 23 to write what I felt at 22 and vindication) and I keep thinking as you think.

I'm not going to stop living.